background...”
(Hilton 22).
Hilton
pointed out that in the painting Picasso made himself look older and
as if he had suffered much more. He related this activity by Picasso
to that of artists who circulated self-portraits or mutual portraits
among Van Gogh's and Gauguin's friends at the end of the 1880's
inscribed "a son copain."
Hilton
suggested that “The
young Picasso, tactfully but also proudly, announces a
half-reverential camaraderie with the artists who had preceded him,
who were close to him though not personally known. He never painted
Braque, or any other living artists, with serious intent” (Hilton
22).
Francois
Gilot related a statement which Picasso made as he was showing her
prints from his Vollard Suite of the 1930's “You
see this truculent character here, with the curly hair and moustache?
That's Rembrandt, or maybe it's Balzac, I'm not sure. It's a
compromise, I suppose. It doesn't really matter. They're only two
of the people who haunt me. Every human being is a whole colony you
know”
(Picasso qtd. in Gilot 45) .
Picasso
was also quoted by Gilot as saying “Every
painter takes himself for Rembrandt...Everybody has the same
delusions”
(Picasso
qtd. in Gilot 45).
Picasso's
delusions may have been jolted by the critical reviews of his first
exhibition in Paris in 1901, accounting for his attempting to conceal
the sources for his work after that exhibition. Even though this
exhibit was a success in terms of sales, the twenty year old artist
was criticized for being an imitator of Steinlen, Lautrec and Van
Gogh. Even Gustave Coquiot, a Picasso supporter and organizer of that
first exhibition admitted “Arriving
in Paris very young, Picasso entered upon his Steinlen period. He
painted the street, gardens, houses, the boys and the women of the
town. He painted them very quickly; up to as many as ten paintings
per
day.
Soon there were so many that his first exhibition was organized, at
Vollard's in June, 1901...He was getting tired of this plagiarism;
and from Steinlen he went on to Lautrec...” (Coquiot
qtd. in Daix 36).
This
negative criticism did not prevent Picasso from continuing to use the
162
No comments:
Post a Comment